If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our or .
| Sourced From |
forest-based carbon offsets may not be as effective as some think, Fox News reports.
Trees grow slowly and “the small print on tree-planting offsets typically indicate a 40-year maturity,” said Adam Stein, co-founder of TerraPass, a San Francisco-based offset company.
Stein says forests carry inherent risks because when trees die, they release the carbon they’ve absorbed during their lifetimes. TerraPass doesn’t offer any forestry options for its customers.
However companies, such as Carbonfund.org, that sell reforestation offsets have no doubt about their effectiveness. The organization sets deadlines for its reforestation projects. For example, the amount of CO2 sequestered by the Nicaragua project is measured only for the first 40 years.
In other offset related news, new U.N. data shows that the issued supply of Kyoto Protocol carbon offsets has grown by a fifth in the past three months, reported Reuters.
For the quarter ended December, Certified Emissions Reduction credits grew by 45.7 million, up 29 percent from 35.5 million issued in the third quarter of 2008.
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Excerpts from a recent post in our blog about this very topic:
Third party verification provides a valuable benefit to sellers and buyers of forestation project credits. In addition to limiting the duration to perhaps 40 years, after which time the sequestration neutralizes as old trees die and new ones grow, percentages of the project can be set aside as a risk-recognized method for damage or destruction, such as in the case of fire.
Russell Simon, communications manager with Carbonfund.org, said it well when discussing the difference between avoiding greenhouse gas escape as with methane capture at landfills, and removing carbon from the atmosphere: “Sequestration is the only kind of project out there that takes CO2 that’s already been released and does something with it.”
Leave a Comment