<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon tax is all very well but let’s not rule out the nuclear option</title>
	<atom:link href="/uk-carbonmarketnews/carbon-tax-is-all-very-well-but-let%E2%80%99s-not-rule-out-the-nuclear-option-12152.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/uk-carbonmarketnews/carbon-tax-is-all-very-well-but-let%e2%80%99s-not-rule-out-the-nuclear-option-12152.htm</link>
	<description>Daily carbon offset news, insight, community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:17:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redjohno</title>
		<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/uk-carbonmarketnews/carbon-tax-is-all-very-well-but-let%e2%80%99s-not-rule-out-the-nuclear-option-12152.htm/comment-page-1#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>redjohno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/?p=12152#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>Rather than look at nuclear power generation ourselves, we should look at exploiting our natural advantages in other areas of generation and utilise /import nuclear power if needed from those with experience and advantages in that area, such as the UK and France</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than look at nuclear power generation ourselves, we should look at exploiting our natural advantages in other areas of generation and utilise /import nuclear power if needed from those with experience and advantages in that area, such as the UK and France</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
