<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview: Carolyn Elefant on the Soundness of Carbon Offsets to Combat Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="/resources/carbonindustryinterviews/interview-carolyn-elefant-on-the-soundness-of-carbon-offsets-to-combat-global-warming-211.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/resources/carbonindustryinterviews/interview-carolyn-elefant-on-the-soundness-of-carbon-offsets-to-combat-global-warming-211.htm</link>
	<description>Daily carbon offset news, insight, community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/resources/carbonindustryinterviews/interview-carolyn-elefant-on-the-soundness-of-carbon-offsets-to-combat-global-warming-211.htm/comment-page-1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s47524.gridserver.com/?p=211#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I mostly agree with one addition.   Reducing a company&#039;s climate impact through internal and external reductions (offsets) should be done concurrently.   Reducing &quot;first&quot; only to be followed by offsetting the rest of the footprint at some undefined future date does not take responsibility for current emissions--which are, of course, contributing to climate change.  By starting immediately on parallel paths: an aggressive reduction plan with an offset plan for the (hopefully declining) ongoing emissions, a company is taking the most comprehensive actions to reduce its climate impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with one addition.   Reducing a company&#8217;s climate impact through internal and external reductions (offsets) should be done concurrently.   Reducing &#8220;first&#8221; only to be followed by offsetting the rest of the footprint at some undefined future date does not take responsibility for current emissions&#8211;which are, of course, contributing to climate change.  By starting immediately on parallel paths: an aggressive reduction plan with an offset plan for the (hopefully declining) ongoing emissions, a company is taking the most comprehensive actions to reduce its climate impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->