<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Strikes Out &#8211; Court Rejects State&#8217;s Third Swing at Carbon Controls</title>
	<atom:link href="/news-channels/usa/texas-strikes-out-court-rejects-states-third-swing-at-carbon-controls-45027.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/news-channels/usa/texas-strikes-out-court-rejects-states-third-swing-at-carbon-controls-45027.htm</link>
	<description>Daily carbon offset news, insight, community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeph</title>
		<link>https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/news-channels/usa/texas-strikes-out-court-rejects-states-third-swing-at-carbon-controls-45027.htm/comment-page-1#comment-35569</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://carbonoffsetsdaily.com/?p=45027#comment-35569</guid>
		<description>Providing &lt;a href=&quot;http://texas.construction.com/research/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;building construction&lt;/a&gt; regulations to keep down CO2 emissions sounds like a great idea. I can understand Texas&#039; concern, they want to keep building power plants, but can&#039;t with these new regulations. At the same time Texas needs to realize these are national regulations, and Texas officials must adhere to these new rules. This is a very interesting topic, that I definitely want to learn more about. I like to use McGraw Hill&#039;s Texas Construction site to find out more on issues like this one, because their website has a ton of Texas construction news. While I occasionally work with McGraw Hill, they have been a favorite construction resource of mine long before we started working together. If you enjoy staying current on Texas construction news, check out the McGraw Hill website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Providing <a href="http://texas.construction.com/research/" rel="nofollow">building construction</a> regulations to keep down CO2 emissions sounds like a great idea. I can understand Texas&#8217; concern, they want to keep building power plants, but can&#8217;t with these new regulations. At the same time Texas needs to realize these are national regulations, and Texas officials must adhere to these new rules. This is a very interesting topic, that I definitely want to learn more about. I like to use McGraw Hill&#8217;s Texas Construction site to find out more on issues like this one, because their website has a ton of Texas construction news. While I occasionally work with McGraw Hill, they have been a favorite construction resource of mine long before we started working together. If you enjoy staying current on Texas construction news, check out the McGraw Hill website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->